Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Heber Frank's avatar

Here is a list of a few of the many problems with the Heartland model when compared to the Book of Mormon text: https://2bc.info/Misc/heartland2.pdf

An ocean voyage from Arabia to North America, only powered by winds and currents (1 Nephi 18:8-9), requires going directly against ocean currents called "gyres" that are known about today. But a voyage from Arabia to 30 degrees south latitude in Chile follows the known gyres and currents all the way..

The Three Witnesses in 1830 told a local newspaper that the Lehites landed on the coast of Chile. In 1836 Frederick G Williams wrote what seems to be a revelation saying they landed there. Some of his descendants claim this was a revelation given to FG Williams in the Kirkland Temple dedication.

If the BoM account took place in the Andes of South America, then there still will be evidences of BoM people in Meso and North America. Why? Because BoM people went in Hagoth's ships to lands north of them.

There are more than one Andes model. Gatekeepers try to dismiss the many scriptural evidences that support any Andes model by finding and ridiculing with one simple issue. But the issues are not any more unbelievable than the North American model's hill Cumorah being South of the narrow neck of land, or the river Sidon running South which everyone else sees as contradictions to the BoM text.

If the Book of Mormon took place in the Andes believers need to focus there. https://2bc.info/Misc/Evidences.pdf

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts